Peer Review Process

JUISI: Jurnal Ilmiah Sistem Informasi applies a double-blind peer review system, in which the identities of authors and reviewers are concealed throughout the review process. This approach ensures objectivity, fairness, and scholarly integrity.

Review Stages

  1. Initial Screening (Desk Evaluation)
    The editorial team evaluates the manuscript for scope relevance, template compliance, completeness, and plagiarism screening (<20% similarity index).
    Manuscripts failing to meet requirements may be rejected at this stage.

  2. Peer Review
    Eligible manuscripts are assigned to at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise.

  3. Editorial Decision
    Based on reviewers’ recommendations, the decision may be:

    • Accepted

    • Minor Revision

    • Major Revision

    • Rejected

  4. Revision and Final Decision
    Authors must revise the manuscript in accordance with reviewer comments within the specified timeframe.

Processing Timeline

  • Regular Review:
    Initial decision is typically provided within 4–6 weeks after successful initial screening.

  • Fast-Track Review:
    Initial decision is provided within 1–2 weeks.
    Fast-track review only accelerates the evaluation process and does not guarantee acceptance.

  • Submission to Publication:
    The overall process from submission to publication is estimated at approximately 3 months, depending on revision cycles and reviewer responsiveness.