Model Pengukuran Working Out Loud (WOL) Terhadap Adopsi Enterprise Social Networks (ESNs)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/jimeb.v2i2.601Keywords:
Corporate Social Network, Workload, Collaboration, Social BusinessAbstract
This study aims to examine the concept of Working Out Loud (WOL) in measuring the success rate of implementing Enterprise Social Networks (ESNs) in companies. The adoption of this technology has not been widely implemented by companies in Indonesia. Implementing ESNs in companies as a tool to drive increased employee collaboration requires integration of social media and enterprise technology infrastructure. This platform does provide benefits for companies in the areas of innovation, increased productivity, and also employee engagement; but on the other hand there are several failures caused by employee factors that only focus on implementing technology without changing employee behavior patterns and also how to measure this behavior. The concept of Working Out Load (WOL) is an indicator tool that can be used to measure the success of ESNs implementation. Although the concept of WOL is still unclear, it provides many benefits. Not much research has discussed the benefits that exist in this relationship. The initial hypothesis of this study is that the two behavioral factors above exist and influence each other but are different, so measurements can be made with the developed scale. This study uses a survey distributed to employees of PT. Djarum (one of the large companies in Indonesia) which has implemented ESNs technology in the period October - November 2022. Processing exploratory analysis and data confirmation using SPSS 22 and AMOS 22 with a total of 313 respondents; which was divided randomly with 200 respondents for confirmation analysis and the rest as data for exploratory analysis. Departing from the abnormal nature and ordinal nature of the item scale used, this study uses the Spearman method (not Pearson). This aims to confirm the hypothesis so as to produce a rating scale for individuals and groups of WOL, so that researchers and practitioners can find WOL behavior in a company as a continuous process. The results of this study can be used as a reference for companies in Indonesia to develop ESN technology and measure the success rate of their operations.
References
Apăvăloaie, Elena-Iulia. (2014). The Impact of the Internet on the Business Environment. Procedia Economics and Finance. 15. 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00654-6.
Bartlett-Bragg, Anne. (2016). Working Out Loud: A step towards building your digital capability. Training & Development Magazine. 43. 12-13.
Becan, Martin & Smutny, Zdenek. (2016). The Use of Enterprise Social Networks in Organizations from the Perspective of Generation Y in the Czech Republic. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business. 63. 83-96. 10.1515/saeb-2016-0106.
Bencsh, Dennis. 2020. Working Out Loud - What’s in for me and my employer? https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/whats-me-my-employer-dennis-bensch
Bhuvan Srinivasan.211. Enterprise Social Networking: The next competitive advantage
Bourhis, Anne & Dubé, Line & Jacob, Réal & Montréal, Hec & Canada,. (2005). The success of virtual communities of practice: The leadership factor. E J Knowl Manag. 3.
Chin, Christie Pei-Yee & Evans, Nina & Choo, Kim-Kwang Raymond. (2015). Enterprise Social Networks: A Successful Implementation within a Telecommunication Company.
Crump, Helen (2017). An Investigation into the Phenomenon and Discourse of Working Out Loud. MRes thesis The Open University.
Derksen, Maarten & Wierenga, Tjardie. (2013). The history of ‘Social Technology’, 1898–1930. History and Technology. 29. 10.1080/07341512.2013.876247.
Dooley, Jennifer Allyson; Jones, Sandra C.; and Iverson, Donald C., "Web 2.0 adoption and user characteristics" (2012). Faculty of Social Sciences - Papers. 28. https://ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers/28
Ellison, Nicole & Gibbs, Jennifer & Weber, Matthew. (2015). The Use of Enterprise Social Network Sites for Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Organizations. American Behavioral Scientist. 59. 103-123. 10.1177/0002764214540510.
Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104-121.
Hipson, Will & Séguin, Daniel. (2017). Goodness of Fit Model. 10.1007/978-3-31928099-8_757-1.
Hu, Nan & Wan, Yun & Ye, Chen & Liu, Ling. (2012). Business Blogging and Enterprise Strategy. International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation. 3. 10.4018/jeei.2012040101.
IBM. (2012). IBM Customer Testimonial: Lowes Home Improvement Uses Social Business to "Work Out Loud" (video) Retrieved August 10, 2014, from https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aww26Hx8yLM
Jennex, Murray & Smolnik, Stefan & Croasdell, David. (2008). Towards Measuring Knowledge Management Success. 360. 10.1109/HICSS.2008.461.
Joshi, Ankur & Kale, Saket & Chandel, Satish & Pal, Dinesh. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology. 7. 396-403. 10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975.
Kiesler, Sara & Kraut, Robert & Cummings, Jonathon & Boneva, Bonka & Helgeson, Vicki & Crawford, Anne. (2002). Internet Evolution and Social Impact. Information Technology - It. 1. 10.1201/9781420025477.Ch10.
Lalic, Danijela.2020.The Usage of Enterprise Social Networks for Productivity Improvement. DOI: 10.21428/92f19a8b.915cef2d
Leibetseder, Bettina. (2011). A Critical Review on the Concept of Social Technology. Social Technologies. 1. 7-24
Mabić, Mirela & Lasić, Marija & Zovko, Jelena. (2019). Web 2.0 Technologies in Business: Why not?. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems. 17. 304-314. 10.7906/indecs.17.2.7.
Malhotra, Naresh. (2006). Questionnaire design and scale development. The handbook of marketing research: Uses, misuses, and future advances.
Manyika, James and Roxburgh , Charles. 2011.The great transformer: The impact of the Internet on economic growth and prosperity. McKinsey Global Institute
Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto & Forero, Carlos. (2010). Goodness-of-Fit Testing. 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01333-6.
Mathiesen, P., & Fielt, E. (2013). Enterprise social networks: a business model perspective. 24th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/65200/
McAfee, A. (2009). Enterprise 2.0: New Collaborative Tools for Your Organization's Toughest Challenges. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Nemoto, T., & Beglar, D. (2014). Developing Likert-scale questionnaires. In N. Sonda & A. Krause (Eds.), JALT2013 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT.
Ogliastri, Enrique & Prado, Andrea & Jager, Urs & Vives, Antonio & Reficco, Ezequiel. (2015). Social Business. 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.73123-0.
O'Reilly, Tim, What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Communications & Strategies, No. 1, p. 17, First Quarter 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1008839
Rauta, Satu & Salanterä, Sanna & Vahlberg, Tero & Junttila, Kristiina. (2017). The Criterion Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of an Instrument for Assessing the Nursing Intensity in Perioperative Settings. Nursing Research and Practice. 2017. 1-9. 10.1155/2017/1048052.
Shen, Fei. (2017). Multitrait‐Multimethod Matrix. 10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0161.
Solans-Domènech, Maite & Pons, Joan & Adam, Paula & Grau, Josep & Aymerich, Marta. (2019). Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure research impact. Research Evaluation. 28. 253-262. 10.1093/reseval/rvz007.
Suša Vugec, D.; Tomičić-Pupek, K. and Bosilj Vukšić, V. 2018.Social business process management in practice: Overcoming the limitations of the traditional business process management. International Journal of Engineering Business Management 10, 1-10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1847979017750927,
Weinberger, D. (2002). Small Pieces Loosely Joined: A Unified Theory of the Web. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
Wildman, Jessica & Thayer, Amanda & Pavlas, Davin & Salas, Eduardo & Stewart, John & Howse, William. (2012). Team Knowledge Research. Human factors. 54. 84-111. 10.1177/0018720811425365
