Authors must have contributed substantially to the design, conduct, analysis, or interpretation of the research; participate in scientific writing or revision; approve the final version; and is responsible for the integrity of its contributions. Contributors who do not meet the authorship criteria are listed in Acknowledgments. Changes to the list of authors must be approved by all authors and editors.

Plagiarism Policy

 All manuscripts are checked for originality using similarity-detection software, such as Turnitin or iThenticate. This screening covers plagiarism, duplication, and the reuse of text without proper attribution. A similarity score is not the sole basis for a decision; editors evaluate the sources, citations, and the context of any identified similarities. Instances of misconduct may result in a requirement for revisions, rejection of the manuscript, or post-publication action.

Allegation of Research Misconduct

JTIK accepts reports regarding alleged breaches of research integrity, such as data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, image manipulation, misuse of AI, and manipulation of the peer-review process. Each report is examined confidentially and objectively. Editors may request clarification and supporting evidence, and may coordinate with relevant institutions in accordance with COPE guidelines.

Conflict of Interest

 Authors, editors, and reviewers are required to disclose any financial or non-financial conflicts of interest that could influence the objectivity of the research or editorial decisions. Such conflicts may arise from employment relationships, funding, research collaborations, commercial interests, or personal relationships. Reviewers or editors who have a relevant conflict of interest must recuse themselves from handling the manuscript.

Post-Publication Discussion

 JTIK provides a mechanism for scholarly discussion regarding published articles through letters to the editor, moderated scientific commentary, or external academic discussion platforms. Authors are given the opportunity to respond to criticisms in an academic manner. Comments must be evidence-based and free from personal attacks.

Correction and Retraction

 JTIK may issue a Correction/Erratum for errors that do not invalidate the main findings, an Expression of Concern in cases involving serious unresolved issues, and a Retraction if the research results are deemed unreliable or in the event of a major ethical breach. All such actions must be clearly justified, dated, and permanently linked to the original article.