Organizational Agility as the Key to Business Sustainability: An Empirical Study on Digital Startups
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/bs9ax064Keywords:
Organizational Agility, Business Sustainability, Digital Startup, Innovation, Dynamic CapabilitiesAbstract
Digital transformation compels Indonesian digital startups to remain agile in responding to rapid market and technological changes. The high failure rate among startups indicates that business sustainability cannot rely solely on technological innovation but must be supported by organizational agility—the ability to adapt quickly, innovate continuously, and manage dynamic environments effectively. This study aims to analyze the role of organizational agility in ensuring business sustainability among digital startups in Indonesia. Using a quantitative explanatory approach, web-based questionnaires were distributed to 200 startup managers across various digital sectors. Data were analyzed with Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to assess the effects of four agility dimensions: structural flexibility, adaptability speed, innovation capability, and market responsiveness. The findings reveal that all agility dimensions significantly and positively affect business sustainability, with innovation capability emerging as the most influential factor. The R² value of 0.68 indicates that agility accounts for a substantial portion of the variance in the sustainability of digital startups. Theoretically, this study reinforces the dynamic capabilities framework by positioning agility as the core strategic link between internal transformation and external environmental changes. In practice, it suggests that startups should foster innovation, accelerate decision-making, and leverage these insights to shape policies that support a sustainable digital ecosystem.
References
Mukherjee, A., Owen, R., Scott, J. M., & Lyon, F. (2024). Financing Green Innovation Startups: A Systematic Literature Review on Early-Stage SME Funding. Venture Capital, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2024.2410730
Agazu, B. G., & Kero, C. A. (2024). Innovation Strategy and Firm Competitiveness: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00381-9
Al-Moaid, N. A. A., & Almarhdi, S. G. (2024). Developing Dynamic Capabilities for Successful Digital Transformation Projects: The Mediating Role of Change Management. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00446-9
Al., I. et. (2023). The Influence of Learning Orientation on Entrepreneurial Performance: The Role of Business Model Innovation and Risk-Taking Propensity. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(3), 100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100133
Arkha, S., Nugroho, A., & Wibowo, A. (2025). Evaluating Digital Transformation within Integration Limitations Using Desk-Based Analytical Case Study. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 4(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v4i2.365
Aswathy et al. (2023). Assessment of Factors Influencing Agility in Start-Ups Industry 4.0. Sustainability, 15(9), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097564
Barba et al. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Organizational Agility: An Analysis of Scientific Production and Future Trends. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 30(2), 100253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2024.100253
Bechtel et al. (2023). The Interplay between Dynamic Capabilities’ Dimensions and Their Relationship to Project Portfolio Agility and Success. International Journal of Project Management, 41(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102469
Bhadra et al. (2024). Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities for Business Sustainability Performance: Evidence from the Indian Manufacturing Sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(6), 5583–5605. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3767
Browder et al. (2024). Upgrading Adaptation: How Digital Transformation Promotes Organizational Resilience. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 18(1), 128–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1483
Chishty, S. K., & Sayari, S. (2024). Does Market Oriented Environmental Sustainability Determine the Export Performance? A Study of Leather Products Manufacturing SMEs in India. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1), 2363427. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2363427
Correggi et al. (2024). Rethinking Dynamic Capabilities in Light of Sustainability: A Bibliometric Analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(8), 7990–8016. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3901
Costa, J., & Moreira, A. C. (2022). Public Policies, Open Innovation Ecosystems and Innovation Performance. Analysis of the Impact of Funding and Regulations. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040210
Dadi Kusumaningtyas, D., & Purwantoro, K. (2023). Peran Pilihan Pendekatan Pemecahan Masalah dan Karakteristik Risiko dalam Mengatasi Gangguan pada Risiko Rantai Pasokan. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 2(2), 37–63. https://doi.org/10.51903/jimeb.v2i2.603
Demetris et al. (2023). Strategic Agility, Openness and Performance: A Mixed Method Comparative Analysis of Firms Operating in Developed and Emerging Markets. Review of Managerial Science, 17(4), 1365-1398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00562-4
Eskedar et al. (2024). Disentangling Organizational Agility from Flexibility, Adaptability, and Versatility: A Systematic Review. Future Business Journal, 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00405-6
Francie et al. (2023). Demystifying Massive and Rapid Business Scaling – An Explorative Study on Driving Factors in Digital Start-Ups. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122841
Girish Prayag et al. (2024). Building Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Resilience in Tourism Firms During COVID-19: A Staged Approach. Journal of Travel Research, 63(3), 713–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231164976
Hagen, B., Ghauri, P. N., & Macovei, V. (2024). The Balancing Act: Organizational Agility in Fast-Growing International Ventures. Industrial Marketing Management, 123, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.09.007
Hao et al. (2024). What is Agile Project Management? Developing a New Definition Following a Systematic Literature Review. Project Management Journal, 55(6), 668–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728241254095
Imran et al. (2024). When Business Model Innovation Creates Value for Companies: A Meta-Analysis on Institutional Contingencies. Journal of Management Studies, 61(5), 1825–1883. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12966
Ludviga, I., & Kalvina, A. (2023). Organizational Agility During Crisis: Do Employees’ Perceptions of Public Sector Organizations’ Strategic Agility Foster Employees’ Work Engagement and Well-Being. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 36(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-023-09442-9
Masitoh, G., Yadi, Y., Rohmah, M., Carolina, D., & Azmiyati, A. (2025). Tren dan Tantangan Transformasi Digital pada UMKM: Systematic Literatur Review. Kompak: Jurnal Ilmiah Komputerisasi Akuntansi, 18(2), 466–477. https://doi.org/10.51903/kompak.v18i2.2872
Muhammad Salman Chughtai, S., Syed, F., Naseer, S., & Chinchilla, N. (2023). Role of Adaptive Leadership in Learning Organizations to Boost Organizational Innovations With Change Self-Efficacy. Current Psychology, 43(33), 27262–27281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04669-z
Mumtaz Ali Memon, Hiram Ting, Jun-Hwa Cheah, Thurasamy, R., Francis Chuah, & Tat Hue Cham. (2020). Sample Size for Survey Research: Review and Recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), 2590–4221. https://doi.org/10.47263/jasem.4(2)01
Nayme, F., & Taybi, I. (2025). Enterprise Risk Management Practices and Their Impact on Firm Performance: Evidence from Multinational Corporations. Journal of Management and Informatics, 4(2), 909–930. https://doi.org/10.51903/jmi.v4i2.297
Nguyen, T., Le, C. V., Nguyen, M., Nguyen, G., Lien, T. T. H., & Nguyen, O. (2024). The Organisational Impact of Agility: A Systematic Literature Review. Management Review Quarterly, 75(3), 2709–2757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00446-9
Paul et al. (2024). Organisational Vulnerability: Exploring the Pathways. Disaster Prevention and Management, 33(6), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-03-2024-0065
Pitelis et al. (2024). Dynamic Capabilities and MNE Global Strategy: A Systematic Literature Review-Based Novel Conceptual Framework. Journal of Management Studies, 61(7), 3295–3326. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13021
Reitzig, M. (2022). How to Get Better at Flatter Designs: Considerations for Shaping and Leading Organizations with Less Hierarchy. Journal of Organization Design, 11(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-022-00109-7
Santoso, A. S. (2024). Effectuation in Digital Multi-Sided Platform Startups: An Entrepreneurial Journey through Open Innovation Process. Digital Business, 4(2), 100085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2024.100085
Sohu, J. M., Hongyun, T., Junejo, I., Akhtar, S., Ejaz, F., Dunay, A., & Hossain, M. B. (2024). Driving Sustainable Competitiveness: Unveiling the Nexus of Green Intellectual Capital and Environmental Regulations on Greening SME Performance. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1348994
Souza et al. (2024). Competitive Advantages of Sustainable Startups: Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Directions. Sustainability, 16(17), 7665. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177665
Szathmári, E., Varga, Z., Molnár, A., Németh, G., Szabó, Z. P., & Kiss, O. E. (2024). Why Do Startups Fail? A Core Competency Deficit Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1299135
Vaszkun, B., & Sziráki, É. (2023). Unlocking the Key Dimensions of Organizational Agility: A Systematic Literature Review on Leadership, Structural and Cultural Antecedents. Society and Economy, 45(4), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2023.00023
Wu, T., Rocha, J. C., Berry, K., Chaigneau, T., Hamann, M., Lindkvist, E., Qiu, J., Schill, C., Shepon, A., Crépin, A. S., & Folke, C. (2024). Triple Bottom Line or Trilemma? Global Tradeoffs between Prosperity, Inequality, and the Environment. World Development, 178, 106595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106595
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nadya Ramadhani Maheswari, Ardiansyah Pratama Santoro

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






.png)